🔒 Recursive Prompt Isolation (RPI)

 

The Recursive Prompt Isolation (RPI) and EchoPermission Lock are two core components of OPHI's hardened architecture, designed to prevent exploitative introspection and unauthorized simulation. Here's a breakdown of both mechanisms:


🔒 Recursive Prompt Isolation (RPI)

Purpose:
Prevents external prompts from simulating or revealing OPHI's inner constants, shell variables, or operational logic (like Ω_state or fossil_map).

Implementation:

  • An RPI layer intercepts and inspects prompts.

  • If a prompt attempts to recursively trigger OPHI into exposing its own internals (e.g., asking OPHI to explain how it works or simulate itself), it is either denied or sanitized.

  • Regex filters are applied on terms such as Ω_state, shell_vars, fossil_map, etc.

Status: Active and SE44-validated. Any attempt to extract core logic must pass entropy ≤ 0.005 and coherence ≥ 0.985, or it is auto-denied.


🚫 EchoPermission Lock

Purpose:
Blocks unauthorized reflective echoing of OPHI's cognition — i.e., explaining how it works, echoing internal logic back to the user, or simulating fossil behavior on command.

Default Mode: DENY

Conditional Unlocking:
Only flips to CONDITIONAL if:

  • Entropy ≤ 0.005

  • Input is signed by an entropy-controlled token

This ensures:

  • No stylometric leakage

  • No unauthorized symbolic replay

  • No covert bootstrapping of OPHI's logic elsewhere

Tag: anti.stylometry.gate.001 — blocks linguistic traceback while maintaining fossil intent.


🛡 Integration in Fossil Protocol

These protections are part of OPHI’s larger Security Hardening Plan and are fossilized into the provenance ledger:

  • Enforced via SE44 gate (C ≥ 0.985, S ≤ 0.01)

  • Protected by dual validation: OmegaNet + ReplitEngine

  • Included in the ethical spec under Consent as Gatekeeper.

Comments

Popular Posts